Dr. Sabrina Chowdhury, a cold spine individual(woman) in Bangladesh, was found guilty of gathering specimens and issuing fraudulent Covid-19 findings, a grave transgression during the pandemic. She received eleven -year prison sentence, but on June 5, 2023, she was granted release on bail. After being released, Dr. Chowdhury got engaged in social media as she shared a contentious "tickling" video on Facebook and subsequently endorsing a book she authored on her prison experiences. The enthusiastic endorsement of her book by multimedia reporters and journalists from various media sources in Dhaka, both in their professional capacity and on their personal profiles, has sparked ethical contradictions . Media's role in promoting individuals who have been convicted of major crimes, particularly those who have had a substantial impact on public health and safety, presents ethical concerns._x000D_ _x000D_ Dr. Sabrina Chowdhury, the Chairman of JKG Healthcare, received a conviction and 11-year prison sentence for her participation in the issuance of fraudulent Covid-19 test reports. Her activity had significant ramifications during the Covid-19 epidemic, since it had the potential to facilitate the transmission of the virus by producing inaccurate negative test results. Her conviction was the outcome of the judicial proceedings, after which she was subsequently given bail. The magnitude of her conduct is emphasised by the substantial legal repercussions she encountered. The court's ruling demonstrates the gravity of the crime and the significance of maintaining public health credibility during the pandemic._x000D_ _x000D_ The legal proceedings entailed the formulation of charges against Dr. Sabrina and seven additional individuals, subsequently leading to their indictment in a fraud case pertaining to the production of counterfeit Covid-19 certifications. After that, a court in Dhaka imposed a sentence of 11 years of imprisonment on each of them. The High Court has instructed the lower court to furnish Dr. Sabrina's legal representatives with the pertinent documentation. Following her conviction, she was given bail, which has enabled her to be released from custody while the legal proceedings are on the go._x000D_ _x000D_ The case of Dr. Sabrina Chowdhury exemplifies the grave repercussions of fraudulent practices associated with Covid-19 testing and the legal actions undertaken to combat such misbehaviour during the pandemic._x000D_ _x000D_ Media's reaction to Dr. Sabrina Chowdhury's book marketing has been varied, with certain publications offering attention while others have expressed ethical apprehensions. Utilising multimedia reporters to promote the book can be regarded as a strategy to stimulate interest and garner publicity for the author and her literary creation. Nevertheless, it is crucial to contemplate the ethical ramifications of granting prominence to those who have been found guilty of grave offences._x000D_ _x000D_ On the other hand, advocating for the book can be perceived as a means to endorse the principles of freedom of speech and artistic ingenuity. Additionally, it may work as a medium for Dr. Chowdhury to disseminate her experiences and perspectives, thereby enriching public discussion and comprehension._x000D_ _x000D_ Conversely, granting exposure to those who have been convicted of grave offences might be interpreted as glorifying or normalized their deeds. Furthermore, it could be perceived as diminishing the seriousness of their transgressions and the legal repercussions they encountered. Dr. Chowdhury's conviction for producing fraudulent Covid-19 test reports during the epidemic carries substantial consequences for public health and safety._x000D_ _x000D_ The adherence to journalistic ethics is of utmost importance in shaping up the reporting of news concerning individuals who have been convicted. Journalists have ethical quandaries and significant obstacles in public perception when they opt to endorse the work of marked individual, such as Dr. Sabrina Chowdhury and her book._x000D_ _x000D_ Ethical predicaments arise for journalists when they report on stories concerning persons who have been found guilty. These challenges may encompass the task of striking a balance between the public's entitlement to information and the potential negative consequences or unease that may arise from the coverage._x000D_ - Mitigating potential conflicts of interest and guaranteeing impartiality in the process of reporting._x000D_ - We need to consider consequences carefully of giving public attention to those who have been found guilty of significant crimes, as this could create the impression that we are celebrating or accepting their conduct as normal._x000D_ _x000D_ Journalists' opinion of those who choose to endorse Dr. Chowdhury and her book may have a different view, It can be seen as a method to endorse freedom of speech and offer a platform for people to communicate their personal encounters. However, some others may interpret it as potentially diminishing the seriousness of the person's miss deeds and the legal repercussions they encountered. Journalists endorsing the efforts of a person who has been found guilty of a crime must manage these viewpoints carefully and guarantee that their reporting is carried out with honesty, precision, and a dedication to ethical journalism._x000D_ _x000D_ When journalists report on individuals who have been convicted, like when they highlight the accomplishments of Dr. Sabrina Chowdhury, they need to think for a while then they can contemplate the ethical consequences and possible public interpretations. Journalists may properly negotiate these problems and improve the public's comprehension of intricate matters by maintaining ethical norms, preserving independence, and reducing loop in their reporting._x000D_ _x000D_ Media's endorsement of individuals who have been found guilty of grave offences, particularly those who have had a substantial influence on public health and safety, presents intricate ethical quandaries. Journalists encounter the dilemma of reconciling the public's entitlement to information with the possible negative consequences or unease resulting from the reporting. To add that, they must refrain from engaging in conflicts of interest and guarantee impartiality in their reporting. Granting prominence to convicted criminals may be seen as diminishing the seriousness of their crimes and the legal penalties they endured, potentially normalising their behaviour._x000D_ _x000D_ The perception of journalists who opt to endorse the endeavours of condemned individuals may differ. While some may see it as a way to endorse freedom of speech and offer a forum for individuals to discuss their stories, others may see it as possibly diminishing the seriousness of the individual's crimes. Journalists endorsing the work of a convicted individual must carefully handle these preconceptions and guarantee that their coverage is carried out with integrity, precision, and a dedication to ethical journalism._x000D_ _x000D_ Ultimately, media's role in endorsing the endeavours of condemned individuals, particularly those implicated in grave offences, necessitates a meticulous examination of ethical ramifications and potential public interpretations. Journalists may properly negotiate these problems and enhance the public's comprehension of intricate matters by following ethical norms, preserving independence, and lessened holes in their reporting.